.TH SLAPD-RELAY 5 "RELEASEDATE" "OpenLDAP LDVERSION"
.\" Copyright 1998-2009 The OpenLDAP Foundation All Rights Reserved.
.\" Copying restrictions apply. See COPYRIGHT/LICENSE.
.\" $OpenLDAP: pkg/ldap/doc/man/man5/slapd-relay.5,v 1.4.4.4 2009/06/03 01:41:57 quanah Exp $
.SH NAME
slapd\-relay \- relay backend to slapd
.SH SYNOPSIS
ETCDIR/slapd.conf
.SH DESCRIPTION
The primary purpose of this
.BR slapd (8)
backend is to map a naming context defined in a database
running in the same
.BR slapd (8)
instance into a virtual naming context, with attributeType
and objectClass manipulation, if required.
It requires the
.BR slapo\-rwm (5)
overlay.
.LP
This backend and the above mentioned overlay are experimental.
.SH CONFIGURATION
The following
.B slapd.conf
directives apply to the relay backend database.
That is, they must follow a "database relay" line and come before any
subsequent "backend" or "database" lines.
Other database options are described in the
.BR slapd.conf (5)
manual page; only the
.B suffix
directive is allowed by the
.I relay
backend.
.TP
.B relay <real naming context>
The naming context of the database that is presented
under a virtual naming context.
The presence of this directive implies that one specific database,
i.e. the one serving the
.BR "real naming context" ,
will be presented under a virtual naming context.
.SH MASSAGING
The
.B relay
database does not automatically rewrite the naming context
of requests and responses.
For this purpose, the
.BR slapo\-rwm (5)
overlay must be explicitly instantiated, and configured
as appropriate.
Usually, the
.B rwm\-suffixmassage
directive suffices if only naming context rewriting is required.
.SH ACCESS RULES
One important issue is that access rules are based on the identity
that issued the operation.
After massaging from the virtual to the real naming context, the
frontend sees the operation as performed by the identity in the
real naming context.
Moreover, since
.B back\-relay
bypasses the real database frontend operations by short-circuiting
operations through the internal backend API, the original database
access rules do not apply but in selected cases, i.e. when the
backend itself applies access control.
As a consequence, the instances of the relay database must provide
own access rules that are consistent with those of the original
database, possibly adding further specific restrictions.
So, access rules in the
.B relay
database must refer to identities in the real naming context.
Examples are reported in the EXAMPLES section.
.SH SCENARIOS
.LP
If no
.B relay
directive is given, the
.I relay
database does not refer to any specific database, but the most
appropriate one is looked-up after rewriting the request DN
for the operation that is being handled.
.LP
This allows to write carefully crafted rewrite rules that
cause some of the requests to be directed to one database, and
some to another; e.g., authentication can be mapped to one
database, and searches to another, or different target databases
can be selected based on the DN of the request, and so.
.LP
Another possibility is to map the same operation to different
databases based on details of the virtual naming context,
e.g. groups on one database and persons on another.
.LP
.SH EXAMPLES
To implement a plain virtual naming context mapping
that refers to a single database, use
.LP
.nf
database relay
suffix "dc=virtual,dc=naming,dc=context"
relay "dc=real,dc=naming,dc=context"
overlay rwm
rwm\-suffixmassage "dc=real,dc=naming,dc=context"
.fi
.LP
To implement a plain virtual naming context mapping
that looks up the real naming context for each operation, use
.LP
.nf
database relay
suffix "dc=virtual,dc=naming,dc=context"
overlay rwm
rwm\-suffixmassage "dc=real,dc=naming,dc=context"
.fi
.LP
This is useful, for instance, to relay different databases that
share the terminal portion of the naming context (the one that
is rewritten).
.LP
To implement the old-fashioned suffixalias, e.g. mapping
the virtual to the real naming context, but not the results
back from the real to the virtual naming context, use
.LP
.nf
database relay
suffix "dc=virtual,dc=naming,dc=context"
relay "dc=real,dc=naming,dc=context"
overlay rwm
rwm\-rewriteEngine on
rwm\-rewriteContext default
rwm\-rewriteRule "dc=virtual,dc=naming,dc=context"
"dc=real,dc=naming,dc=context" ":@"
rwm\-rewriteContext searchFilter
rwm\-rewriteContext searchEntryDN
rwm\-rewriteContext searchAttrDN
rwm\-rewriteContext matchedDN
.fi
.LP
Note that the
.BR slapo\-rwm (5)
overlay is instantiated, but the rewrite rules are written explicitly,
rather than automatically as with the
.B rwm\-suffixmassage
statement, to map all the virtual to real naming context data flow,
but none of the real to virtual.
.LP
Access rules:
.LP
.nf
database bdb
suffix "dc=example,dc=com"
# skip...
access to dn.subtree="dc=example,dc=com"
by dn.exact="cn=Supervisor,dc=example,dc=com" write
by * read
database relay
suffix "o=Example,c=US"
relay "dc=example,dc=com"
overlay rwm
rwm\-suffixmassage "dc=example,dc=com"
# skip ...
access to dn.subtree="o=Example,c=US"
by dn.exact="cn=Supervisor,dc=example,dc=com" write
by dn.exact="cn=Relay Supervisor,dc=example,dc=com" write
by * read
.fi
.LP
Note that, in both databases, the identities (the
.B <who>
clause) are in the
.BR "real naming context" ,
i.e.
.BR "`dc=example,dc=com'" ,
while the targets (the
.B <what>
clause) are in the
.B real
and in the
.BR "virtual naming context" ,
respectively.
.SH ACCESS CONTROL
The
.B relay
backend does not honor any of the access control semantics described in
.BR slapd.access (5);
all access control is delegated to the relayed database(s).
Only
.B read (=r)
access to the
.B entry
pseudo-attribute and to the other attribute values of the entries
returned by the
.B search
operation is honored, which is performed by the frontend.
.SH FILES
.TP
ETCDIR/slapd.conf
default slapd configuration file
.SH SEE ALSO
.BR slapd.conf (5),
.BR slapd\-config (5),
.BR slapo\-rwm (5),
.BR slapd (8).